.net

December 4, 2006 .net

Holy Cow! An Entire WPF/E DevCenter!

I expected eventually to get a WPF/E (Windows Presentation Foundation Everywhere) download or two, but these guys went crazy; they just released an entire WPF/E DevCenter this morning. Here’re just a few highlights:

Enjoy!

P.S. Regardless of whether humans caused global warming or whether it’s part of a natural cycle, it’s happening and we’re going to have to deal with it.

November 7, 2006 .net

.NET Framework 3.0 (aka WinFX) Has Shipped!

After a monumental amount of work, the .NET Framework 3.0 has been completed! It ships out of the box in Vista, but for down level clients (Windows XP and Windows Server 2003) and developer tools, see the links below:

Wahoo!

October 6, 2006 .net

WPF: Enabling Crimes Against Nature in a Good Way

WPF: Enabling Crimes Against Nature in a Good Way

My friend Jeff asked me to do a terrible thing yesterday: How do I show a form in the popup window that a menu shows?” I said, Dude! Don’t do that — write a dialog!” And that’s what he did, but then, like a train wreck, I couldn’t look away. It took me all of 10 minutes of very straight forward coding and here we are:

If you’re familiar with WPF, data binding and data templates, this is all standard stuff. Here’s the data structure:

class Person : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    string name;
    public string Name
    {
        get { return name; }
        set { name = value; Notify("Name"); }
    }
    int age;
    public int Age
    {
        get { return age; }
        set { age = value; Notify("Age"); }
    }
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
    void Notify(string prop) { if( PropertyChanged != null ) { PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(prop)); } }
}

The data template is also bog standard:

<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:Person}">
  <Grid>
    <Grid.RowDefinitions>
      <RowDefinition Height="auto" />
      <RowDefinition Height="auto" />
    </Grid.RowDefinitions>
    <Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
      <ColumnDefinition Width="auto" />
      <ColumnDefinition Width="auto" />
    </Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
    <Label Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="0">_Name</Label>
    <TextBox Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="1" Text="{Binding Name}" />
    <Label Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="0">_Age</Label>
    <TextBox Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1" Text="{Binding Age}" />
  </Grid>
</DataTemplate>

Setting up the app itself is nothing special:

<Window ...>
  <Window.Resources>
    <DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:Person}">
      ...
    </DataTemplate>
  </Window.Resources>
  <Grid>
    <Menu>
      <MenuItem Header="File">
        <MenuItem Header="Exit" x:Name="fileExitMenuItem" />
      </MenuItem>
      <MenuItem Header="Form" ItemsSource="{Binding}" />
    </Menu>
  </Grid>
</Window>

Notice that the items that make up the menu come from a binding to the ambient data source, which we set in the code-behind:

protected override void OnInitialized(EventArgs e)
{
    ...
    Person tom = new Person();
    tom.Name = "Tom";
    tom.Age = 11;
    DataContext = new Person[] { tom };
}

The only thing at all tricky is that, even though we’re only editing a single object in the popdown window,” it has to be in an implementation of IEnumerable so that the menu can display it (it expects items to come in a list).

That’s it. You can download the RC1 WPF project here.

You might wonder why I would post such a sample, when clearly that’s not a UI we want to foster on folks. The answer is simple: because WPF allows it.

The power of any platform should be judged by how well it lets you write bad code. Early versions of Visual Basic let you write really bad code — but it worked. Likewise, WPF lets me build the worst UIs ever — but they work. This is necessary so that UI visionaries can experiment and get to a place where they’re doing something completely different from UIs of today and we like it.

Do you think the Office folks, who, for all practical purposes, have been setting UI guidelines on Windows for a decade, could use MFC or Windows Forms? No, because they’re not flexible enough. Could they use WPF? Absolutely they could. And so can you.

The crayon box has lots of colors that I don’t like, but in the hands of an artist, they can create beauty.

October 1, 2006 .net

Sept CTP of .NET 3.0

The CTPs are coming so fast and so furious now that I nearly missed the September 2006 .NET Framework 3.0 CTP:

Enjoy!

September 7, 2006 .net

.NET 3.0 RC1 Download

August 13, 2006 .net

WPF Security in 14 Points and Some Extra Words

MikeDub has a nice summary to get you started down the road to WPF ClickOnce deployment, both for stand-alone apps and browser-based apps (XBAPs). Enjoy.
July 30, 2006 .net

On W*F Integration Samples

As you may or may not recall, Doug Purdy and I had some trouble at the last PDC getting Avalon (WPF) and Indigo (WCF) to work together. To save myself from having that trouble again, I came back from the PDC and starting the WinFX Cross-Pillar SDK Samples Working Group,” which is just a fancy name for the PMs in charge of Avalon, Indigo and Workflow samples getting together to make sure that we have a list of simple technology samples showing the three W*F technologies working together.

You can see the results of that work in the .NET 3.0 SDK under the Integration Samples for WinFX Features topic. Right now, there are 9 integration samples and I’m hoping to almost double that by .NET 3.0 RTM. I’d love feedback. Thanks!

June 12, 2006 .net

WinFX + .NET 2.0 Renamed .NET 3.0

The WinFX name is no more. Instead, WinFX (.NET 2.0 + W*F)is .NET 3.0. <whew>